Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Obama Promotes H1N1 Vaccine for America, But WON'T Vaccinate His Daughters

More from the world of Barack Obama's double standards: while the President and his administration have been advising Americans to take the potentially dangerous, experimental H1N1 vaccine, his own daughters have not been given the shot.

A convenient excuse was furnished to inquiring reporters by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs who says "the vaccine is not available to them based on their risk" (see the report on Fox News Blogs). Now how is that for double talk?

In earlier entries on this blog, we provided links to the National Vaccine Information Center which explain the danger associated with the experimental H1N1 vaccine. We also would like to now remind our leader that Barack Obama recently gave immunity to vaccine manufacturers in the event the vaccine kills or harms people (see complete articles on Healthier Talk.com and AHRP). Hmm ... could this be the REAL reason the President won't vaccinate his daughters?

Saturday, October 24, 2009

New Evidence of Obama Kenyan Birth Confirmed by the Associated Press

There's new evidence that the Dad Basher-in-Chief may be ineligible to hold office, and it comes from none other than the Associated Press.

According to the website Post & Mail, the Associated Press on June 27, 2004 stated the following in a report syndicated worldwide: "Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations".

On November 4, 2008, another AP report also repeated the claim in a story supplied to the Modern Ghana news.

The website also claims that in 2004, while running for Illinois State Senate, Republican contender Alan Keyes accused Obama of not being a "natural born citizen". Obama is said to have replied, "So what? I am running for Illinois Senator, not the presidency", apparently admitting that Keyes was right.

Read the full story at the Post & Mail.

Friday, October 23, 2009

British Government Seizes Children from Overweight Parents

The British Government has dreamed up a new way to take children away from their parents -- because they are fat!

This is the word from the British Sky News network. According to its report, seven children, including a newborn, were removed from their parents' home in the city of Dundee after the review of a government "Children's Panel".

How long before this bureaucratic nightmare comes to our shores?

Read more at SkyOnline.

Monday, October 12, 2009

Virginia Judge Orders Parent to Enroll,in Communist Mind Control Class

The alternate news website Infowars has today published letter from a parent in Montgomery County, Virginia, who claims she was ordered by a family court judge to attentd a parenting class based on Communist psychotherapy principles.

Read more at Infowars!

Saturday, October 3, 2009

Child Support & Alimony Payments May Have Drove Alleged Letterman Blackmailer

We've heard at NCPForce! that many divorced dads and non-custodial parents are sometimes driven to crime to pay off unrealistic child support debts. It's America's best kept, dirty little secret. And now this reality is exploding into the open thanks to a top celebrity news story.

Recently, a producer at NBC was arrested for allegedly trying to blackmail late night host David Letterman. His possible motive: child support and alimony payments totaling a jaw dropping $6,800 per month!

Read more about this story at Entertainment Tonight.

Friday, October 2, 2009

Wal-Mart Teaches Married Couple
What It Means to Be an NCP

AJ and Lisa Demaree were just a normal couple living in Arizona until the day they stepped into a local Wal-Mart to have photos developed. But a number of innocent bath time pics of their daughters landed them in a bureaucratic and legal nightmare, with state and city authorities seizing their children and invading their family's privacy.

In short, the Demarees received a crash course in what it means to be a non-custodial parent in America.

While NCPForce! sympathizes with the Demarees and wishes the family success in its lawsuit against Wal-Mart and the government entities involved in the case, it is necessary to point out that NCPs must deal with these same abuses on an every day basis. Luckily for the Demarees, they were able to regain their children and can now seek restitution for their horrible experience. But for many NCPs, all it takes is one false accusation from an ex to land them in jail on child abuse charges and to have all access to their children cut off.

We hope that the journalists, columnists, and bloggers who have expressed their righteous indignation over this story will show the same concern for all NCPs in the future.

See full story.

Thursday, September 17, 2009

Conservative Phyllis Schafly Speaks Out for Divorced Dads & NCPS

It's not everyday a conservative speaks out in support of divorced dads and NCPs being ground to pulps by the Bradley Amendment and child support collection agencies.

But back in July, that exactly what conservative columnist Phyllis Schafly did. One of our readers informed us of her column which reads:

"Did you know that a family court can order a man to reimburse the government for the welfare money, falsely labeled "child support," that was paid to the mother of a child to whom he is not related? Did you know that, if he doesn't pay, a judge can sentence him to debtor's prison without ever letting him have a jury trial?
Did you know that debtor's prisons (putting men in prison because they can't pay a debt) were abolished in the United States before we abolished slavery, but that they exist today to punish men who are too poor to pay what is falsely called "child support"?
Did you know that when corporations can't pay their debts, they can take bankruptcy, which means they pay off their debts for pennies on the dollar, but a man can never get an alleged "child support" debt forgiven or reduced, even if he is out of a job, penniless and homeless, medically incapacitated, incarcerated (justly or unjustly) or serving in our Armed Forces overseas, can't afford a lawyer, or never owed the money in the first place?
Did you know that when a woman applying for welfare handouts lies about who the father of her child is, she is never prosecuted for perjury? Did you know that judges can refuse to accept DNA evidence showing that the man she accuses is not the father?
Did you know that alleged "child support" has nothing to do with supporting a child because the mother has no obligation to spend even one dollar of it on a child, and in many cases none of the "support" money ever gets to a child because it goes to fatten the payroll of the child-support bureaucracy?
These are among the injustices the feminists, and their docile liberal male allies, have inflicted on men. The sponsor was former Democratic senator from New Jersey and presidential candidate Bill Bradley."

Read the entire article at World Net Daily.

And thank you Phyllis!

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

New Government Air Travel Rules May Prevent NCPs from Flying

A new government program is going into effect which may eventually lead to non-custodial parents winding up on no-fly lists.

The Transit Security Authority's new Secure Flight program is now being phased in at a number of air carriers and will require all passengers to check in with a government issued photo ID, which will then be checked against "government" watch lists.

As is usual since 2001, our government is making this new law which undermines privacy in order to "protect" us from a terrorist threat. But how long will it be before this program is used to harass ordinary citizens?

With a federal government that has extended it reach into private lives through Draconian family law legislation like the Bradley Amendment, we can guarantee it won't be long before NCPs with child support arrears are rounded up at airports.

Another frightening aspect of this program is that the TSA does not only oversee air travel. It also governs rail and nautical transport. Combine this with driver's licence seizure and the unemployed NCP will have no place to go except straight to debtor's prison.

Read more at Infowars and at the TSA's website.

KEEP US INFORMED: All readers are encouraged to contact us if they are impacted by Secure Flight in relation to a family court matter. Write us at mailcenter@ncpforce.com.

Saturday, September 12, 2009

New York Times Makes Major Discovery: Abuses Against Military NCPs

The New York Times has made a startling discovery: there are abuses against NCPs in America's family courts, which routinely abuse our nation's returning veterans.

In an article published 9/1/09, "all-the news that's fit to print" covered the story a veteran who recently returned from war torn Iraq only to be dragged through the terror mill of a New Jersey family court. The tone of the article was one of astonishment, as if this sort of abuse was new.

Four years ago, NCPForce! featured on this website a page about abuses against military dads and called for a boycott of military enlistment.

The Times, it seems, only deemed this issue worthy enough for publication because the subject of their article happens to be a female veteran.

While we at NCPForce! wish Specialist Leydi Mendoza all the best in her battle to have a normal relationship with her daughter, we must ask the Times why it waited so long to address this issue and why it chose to focus specifically on a female veteran?

Every day in courts around America, military dads face rampant abuses and their stories are no less newsworthy. By choosing to focus on a military mom, the Times has put a familiar spin on stories about family law abuses where women are always victims and men are always aggressors.

We at NCPForce! are against such stereotypes and gender-baiting, and we ask that the New York Times better balance its stories in the future ... and to stop pretending that family law abuses are so rare.

Saturday, September 5, 2009

Obama to Indoctrinate our Children on September 8th

Warning to ALL PARENTS:

Our Dad Basher-in-Chief, President Obama, will be indoctrinating our children this coming Tuesday, September 8th, by asking all schools to tune into his nationally televised speech.

During the speech, Obama will ask children to participate in a number of activities, among them: Think what the President wants us to do; consider whether the speech makes you want to do anything; ask if we are able to do what President Obama is asking of us.

Shadows of the Third Reich we ask? Or is it not Fascism if WE do it?

You be the judge and make an informed decision about allowing your children to attend school if they will be made to participate in this event. Read more at the following links:

Michelle Malkin.com

Daily Paul

Tennessean.com

Friday, August 28, 2009

Responsibility Obama Style Revisited: Queen Michelle's 26 Servants

Several months ago, we told our readers about the Obama free-wheeling, free-spending ways in the White House during a time of economic crisis. This was in our article, Responsibility, Obama Style, which is still available on this site for those who missed it.

We now learn that First Lady, Michelle Obama -- who joined her husband tagteaming dads on Father's Day this year -- apparently believes she is a queen.

According to FactCheck.org and an article in the Canada Free Press, Michelle Obama employs 26 personal servants on the public's dime. This is more personal servants than any other First Lady in history, even more than the much maligned Bush family.

And the cost for all this? Hold onto your hats: a stunning $1,750,000 per year!

Here's a list of some of the servants and the cost for each; Michelle's private hairdresser and make-up artist are not included:

  1. $172,2000 - Sher, Susan (Chief Of Staff)
  2. $140,000 - Frye, Jocelyn C. (Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of Policy And Projects For The First Lady)
  3. $113,000 - Rogers, Desiree G. (Special Assistant to the President and White House Social Secretary)
  4. $102,000 - Johnston, Camille Y. (Special Assistant to the President and Director of Communications for the First Lady)
  5. $102,000 - Winter, Melissa E. (Special Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)
  6. $90,000 - Medina, David S. (Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)
  7. $84,000 - Lelyveld, Catherine M. (Director and Press Secretary to the First Lady)
  8. $75,000 - Starkey, Frances M. (Director of Scheduling and Advance for the First Lady)
  9. $70,000 - Sanders, Trooper (Deputy Director of Policy and Projects for the First Lady)
  10. $65,000 - Burnough, Erinn J. (Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary)
  11. $65,000 - Reinstein, Joseph B. (Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary)
  12. $62,000 - Goodman, Jennifer R. (Deputy Director of Scheduling and Events Coordinator For The First Lady)
  13. $60,000 - Fitts, Alan O. (Deputy Director of Advance and Trip Director for the First Lady)
  14. $60,000 - Lewis, Dana M. (Special Assistant and Personal Aide to the First Lady)
  15. $52,500 - Mustaphi, Semonti M. (Associate Director and Deputy Press Secretary To The First Lady)
  16. $50,000 - Jarvis, Kristen E. (Special Assistant for Scheduling and Traveling Aide To The First Lady)
  17. $45,000 - Lechtenberg, Tyler A. (Associate Director of Correspondence For The First Lady)
  18. $45,000 - Tubman, Samantha (Deputy Associate Director, Social Office)
  19. $40,000 - Boswell, Joseph J. (Executive Assistant to the Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)
  20. $36,000 - Armbruster, Sally M. (Staff Assistant to the Social Secretary)
  21. $36,000 - Bookey, Natalie (Staff Assistant)
  22. $36,000 - Jackson, Deilia A. (Deputy Associate Director of Correspondence for the First Lady)

We'd like to leave you with the following quote of Michelle Obama:

“In my own life, in my own small way, I have tried to give back to this country that has given me so much,” she said. “See, that’s why I left a job at a big law firm for a career in public service.”
— Michelle Obama

Friday, August 7, 2009

Obama's Freudian Slip

A Freudian slip, is that which occurs when someone says or does something which expresses a repressed wish. The term, used in psychoanalysis, was named after Dr. Sigmund Freud, who was the first to explore such slips.

Now comes Obama's Nazi slip on the healthcare issue with the unveiling of a new healthcare symbol on the White House website. Obama, who likes to "brand" his policies the way big corporations brand their products, is known for his fondness of slick graphic symbols. But now, according to conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh, Obama might have branded himself in a very negative way.

Limbaugh says that Obama's health care symbol very closely resembles a Nazi eagle. Below are the two symbols side by side. You be the judge ...

  Nazi Eagle - Inglorious Basterds
Obama's New Health Care Symbol... ... and the inspiration? (An example of a Nazi eagle taken from an ad for the film "Inglorious Basterds").

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Stasi, KGB, Gestapo - The Obama Way

Several weeks ago, we mentioned in this blog how all Americans will soon be getting a taste of the Nazi tactics which have been used to oppress divorced dads and NCPs.

Now President Obama is pushing the Fascist throttle up another notch forming a nationwide snitch network to gather up names for a White House enemies list. This according to Senator John Cornyn of Texas.

Earlier this week, the White House on its own blog site asked Americans to inform on other Americans who might be saying negative things about Obama's health care plan on the internet, and even asked readers to forward "suspicious" e-mails they might receive to the White House.

This new domestic spying operation is the fallout of Obama's nosediving poll numbers on the health care issue (which many critics assail for its Nazi-like health rationing policies, its potential to heighten the tax burden, and for the priorities it gives to non-citizen illegal aliens).

For more information, see the following links:

Infowars - http://www.infowars.com/white-house-ask-people-to-spy-on-health-care-dissidents/

Washington Examiner - http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/
opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Obamas-dissident-database-could-be-secret----and-permanent-52571822.html

Tuesday, August 4, 2009

An Open Letter to President Obama

Dear President Obama:

First let us return the sentiments you and your wife extended to American dads on their special day by offering our best wishes on your special day. We wish you very a happy birthday ... if it is indeed your birthday. There is so much that is dubious regarding your birth, and there is so much you've been untruthful about, that no one can really take you at face value. But for the moment, we will assume that it is indeed your birthday and offer you a few words of advice which you can take with you as you go forward into what we hope is a better year for all of us.

Mr. President, we at NCPForce! have placed you and your administration under scrutiny because of your attacks on American dads on Father's Day and at other times when it seems you need to do some political posturing. We do not focus on you because you are a Democrat (or because we are "right-wing", a familiar charge leveled at anyone who questions you or your policies). Nor do we focus on you because you are Afro-American. On the contrary, we are proud that our country has been able to look past the color of a man's skin to do what no other western nation has been able to do, that is to elect a black man to its highest office.

And it is because we are proud of this accomplishment that we are especially disappointed in you, and what you have done since gaining your party's nomination to hold the office you now hold. If any President should know better about using the politics of division, it is you President Obama. As an Afro-American, you of all people should know how hurtful and dehumanizing it is to target a specific group of people for selfish political ends. But despite your heritage, you have chosen to engage in divisive politics by unfairly targeting American fathers for moralizing sermons on their special day, just to make yourself appear as a leader who knows how to fix a broken society.

This Father's Day and last, when you spoke out against "absent fathers", you expressed either your ignorance of issues faced by divorced dads, or your contempt for those who come out on the losing end of our dysfunctional family law system. You did this in a manner which is extremely harmful to dads who are fighting an uphill battle for their rights in America's family courts, because your words were designed to stir up hate and discrimination.

Before we get into the specifics of what you said and why it was wrong, first imagine yourself making a similar address on Mother's Day. Imagine what our media would say if you came out on that day and spoke out against women who undergo abortions to destroy unwanted children. Or if you spoke out against women who drop their children at safe surrender sites. Or if you chastised mothers who fail to obey visitation orders. Yes, Mr. President, you would be widely condemned. But because American fathers have been lax in defending their rights, and because the media which adores you has become so accustomed to demonizing fathers with impunity, you are allowed to get away with your attacks on American dads.

Now to the specifics. First, what is truly disturbing about your dad bashing sermons is their deep-rooted racial hatred against people of color. Whenever you speak of absent fathers, it is always directed towards inner city absent fathers, and everyone knows that this is code for people of color. Never do you direct your wrath against white suburban fathers who might be absent from their children's lives (although they also should not be targeted by you for reasons we will discuss below).

You habitually attack absent fathers of color, yet you refuse to address any of the real causes for the breakdown of inner city families. The laughable minimum wage ... the dead end jobs in which people are hired and fired like animals ... the drugs and crime ... illegal immigration ... and the slumlords who suck the lifeblood from inner city people -- none of this is ever put into its proper perspective when you talk about fatherhood. As a matter of fact, your government is doing close to nothing (or about a much as the last administration) to address these problems and to give inner city families hope. Hundreds of billions have gone to wealthy bankers and have disappeared into the black holes of organizations like the Federal Reserve, but there's nary a penny for ordinary folks.

Now, about those white suburban absent dads who don't seem to be a bother to you. Most likely, they never appear your radar because you might not consider them a financial burden; they're AOK with you if they're paying their court-ordered child support and don't complain much. And it seems you couldn't give a feather whether or not they actually ever see their children. Because if you did truly care about fatherhood, you would know that there are millions of dads who are doing everything right financially, yet are still absent from their children's lives because of the way our family law system works.

We will not buy the excuse that you are unaware of this, because you are an intelligent man and an attorney; you know what's going on. The only plausible explanation for your behavior is that you simply do not care, and that you continue to approach the issue of absent fathers the way you do because it's a reliable political stunt ... at least for now.

President Obama, the truth is that inner city dads and suburban dads are in the same boat when they find themselves embroiled in our family law system. Both feel the sting of discrimination from the very first moment they step foot into the courtroom. If they ever want to have a relationship with their children after being called to a family court, they'd first better have thousands of dollars to pay for attorney's fees. Many who spend entire life savings in custody and visitation battles sometimes end up no better than those who cannot afford attorneys all, and have their rights trampled completely in our courts.

And heaven help the father who gets sick, disabled, or becomes unemployed, because our system will fling them in jail if they fall behind on support payments. On top of this, our system also makes sure that fathers with arrears are kicked down into an ever-deepening abyss of debt. Fathers who owe as little as $1000 in support payments (and it is easy to fall behind on such an amount these days) are stripped of driver's licenses and professional licenses, making it difficult for them to ever find work again. They are also stripped of passports -- a critical piece of identification to obtain a job -- and are thereby reduced to the status of second-class citizen. And worst of all, a heinous piece of federal legislation known as the Bradley Amendment makes it impossible for a father to appeal or adjust child support ... ever ... under any circumstances.

Mr. President, you have said on record that you defend the right of a woman to have an abortion because you want your daughters to have an option if they make a "mistake". Well, what about young men who make a mistake? In your warped view of things, it is perfectly fine for a woman to rip a child out of her womb and drop unwanted children into the care of taxpayers at safe surrender sites, but it is abhorrent if a man is absent from a child's life (for any reason) or fails to pay every last penny (for any reason).

This is the sort of behavior which has caused so many Americans -- even many who supported you in your campaign -- to regard you with distrust. You came to the presidency on a platform of a "different kind of politics", and vowed to uphold a Constitution which was trampled upon by your predecessor. Yet even before you were elected, you began picking and choosing which laws you would uphold and which groups you would single out for abuse.

Finally, President Obama, let us say that we expect this long letter to fall on deaf ears. That is because we know what you are and will say it plainly: you are a Fascist. The proof is in the way you've conducted yourself thus far, just like your predecessor, using your authority to enrich and empower the elites of our society while using sinister ploys to confuse ordinary Americans and set them against one another.

We can only hope that we are wrong about this. But if you want to prove that you are the man you say you are, and if you truly wish to talk about American fatherhood, address the issue properly. And you don't have to wait until next Father's Day, or your next birthday, to set things right. Tell America that the family law system needs to be reformed.

Until you do, NCPForce! will be out here doing it for you.

Sincerely,

The Organizing Volunteers of NCPForce!

Obama Ineligible to Hold Office? Kenyan Birth Certificate Surfaces

Perhaps you haven't heard, because the mainstream media doesn't want you to know. But America's dad basher-in-chief, Barack Obama, may be ineligible to hold office.

For the past several months, rumors have swirled regarding Obama's eligibility to hold office as President because he may not have been born in the United States. A number of lawsuits have also been filed, and much evidence has been presented which suggests that Obama may be engaged in a cover-up.

According to American citizens concerned about this issue (who the mainstream media derisively calls "birthers"), Obama might have been born in Kenya and not Hawaii, making him about as eligible to hold the office of President as Austrian-born showman, Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Obama enforcers in the media and the government have been busy marginalizing those with questions about his Kenyan birth; dismissing lawsuits on flimsy grounds; and even systematically attacking journalists who dare speak their minds, like CNN's Lou Dobbs.

And Obama himself has spent over $1 Million dollars to avoid presenting his long-form birth certificate to court -- very strange since it's an inexpensive document which would put his critics to rest.

Now comes news that a California attorney, Orly Taitz, has come into possession of a Kenyan birth certificate which seems to be the smoking gun. Pictures of the document are provided below:

It's not our place to say whether this document is genuine.

But NCPForce! would like to point out that Obama has consistently lied to the American people. And he's also man without any kind of a paper trail .

Among other documents which are unavailable to reporters are those from Occidental College in California (where some theorists say he may have received financial aid as a foreign-born student); his writings from the Yale University Law Review; and his client list as a private attorney.

To read more about this issue, check out the following links:

Newsmax - http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/
obama_hawaii_birth_papers/2009/08/06/244836.html

World Net Daily - http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=78931

LA Times - http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/
2009/02/obama-birth-cer.html

In the meantime, does anyone know how to say "Happy Birthday, Mr. President!" in Kenyan?

Additional:

NCPForce! invites interested parties to support CNN's Lou Dobbs on the investigation of the birth certificate issue by writing to the following executives at CNN.

* Jim.Walton@turner.com (president of CNN Worldwide)

* Susan.Grant@turner.com (executive vice president of CNN News Services)

* Jon.Klein@turner.com (president of CNN/US)

* Rena.Golden@turner.com (senior vice president and executive producer of CNN.com)

* David.Payne@turner.com (senior vice president and general manager of CNN.com)

* Mitch.Gelman@turner.com (senior vice president and senior executive producer of CNN.com)

Monday, August 3, 2009

Obama Gets New Look

All this week, in a run up to the Dad Basher-in-Chief's birthday on August 9th, NCPForce! will be devoting blog entries to Barack Obama.

Today we'd like to share with you an amazing, grassroots poster campaign which is hitting the streets of Los Angeles. The poster features President Obama in Heath Ledger's "Joker" face paint with the word "socialism" underneath.

The poster has already gone viral on the internet and is now showing up in other cities, as the witty comparison of Obama to to Ledger's lying, manipulative, destructive madman has struck cultural resonance. And Obama's various enforcers are hopping mad.

The liberal LA TImes Weekly and Earl Ofari Hutchinson, president of the Los Angeles Urban Policy Roundtable, denounced the image and called on those behind it to reveal themselves. "Depicting the president as demonic and a socialist goes beyond political spoofery," says Hutchinson, who apparently believes that America elected a king and not a politician last November.

But many other bloggers, like Thomas Lifson of the conservative American Thinker website, are delighted. Lifson writes: "It is starting. Open mockery of Barack Obama, as disillusionment sets in with the man, his policies, and the phony image of a race-healing, brilliant, scholarly, middle-of-the-roader."

We here at NCPForce! are delighted too. In fact, NCPForce! has mocked up another version of the Obama-Joker poster to help generate family law reform awareness. This is it:

Click on the image above to get a full size version to print out.

Right click on it to save it, and use it in your e-mails or your own websites.

Monday, July 27, 2009

More Warnings About Flu Shots

More warnings about flu shots from the National Vaccine Information Center, a vaccine watch dog group formed to protect children from vaccine disasters like the one in 1976.

In the two videos below, NVIC director Barbara Loe Fisher talks about potential dangers of the experimental swine flu vaccination and the swine flu outbreak in general.

NCPForce! is asking all members and readers to pass on these links to friends and family members to make sure that our children not be forced by our government to take potentially harmful vaccines a month from now when the school year begins.

Saturday, July 25, 2009

Barack Obama's $50,000/week Vacation Home

A couple of weeks ago, we published an article about the freewheeling, free-spending ways of America's dad basher-in-chief, Barack Obama -- a man who likes to talk temperance and responsibility, rather than practice them.

According to news reports, Obama is planning a summer vacation at a posh getaway on Martha's Vineyard where elites need only apply for reservations. A week's rent at the vacation home is rumored to be $50,000, and thus far there's no word whether or not the President will be charging this to the American taxpayer.

Seeing how he's charged his "date nights" to the general public before -- racking up millions in Air Force One flights and security costs -- it wouldn't surprise us if ordinary Americans will ponying up cash for this one too.

For more coverage, see this article in the New York Post.

Monday, July 20, 2009

Gov't Grants Legal Immunity for Possible Flu Vaccine Disaster

On July 13th, we blogged about the possibility of our government forcing an experimental and possibly dangerous flu vaccination on our children this fall.

The rumblings of something unsavory coming down the pike grew louder today with news from the Associated Press that Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, signed a document granting legal immunity to vaccine manufacturers and government officials, shielding them from any and all legal action resulting from a vaccination disaster.

As we mentioned in our earlier blog on this, one of the swine flu vaccine manufacturers contracted by the government is Baxter, which recently shipped flu vaccine tainted with lethal, live avian flu to Europe.

Recently, an Austrian investigative journalist named Baxter in a lawsuit she filed charging that the company, along with UN and WHO officials, have conspired to unleash a global pandemic for the economic gain of an international corporate syndicate. Barack Obama and Kathleen Sibelius were also named in the suit.

Sure ... she's crazy. But given the immunity measure, it may be time for custodial and non-custodial parents alike to start paying close attention to this issue.

Read more at the Center for Global Research.

Saturday, July 18, 2009

America Lurching Towards Fascism With Stardust In Its Eyes

America at large will soon get a taste of what divorced dads and NCP's have been living with for decades: the rule of a Fascist police state not unlike Hitler's Germany right here in the United States.

So says author and political advisor Naomi Wolf in a recent interview with Russia Today TV, (Russia's English language version of CNN, which can be found on cable stations in the U.S.). And Wolf lays the finger of blame on America' dad-basher in chief, Barack Obama.

Wolf's comments are especially compelling especially when one considers that Wolf was up until now a darling of the liberal media establishment. Her book, "The End of America" published in 2007, was highly critical of the Bush administration which she accused of mimicking Fascist dictatorships in the past by taking steps to erode American democratic values. And she also voted for Obama for the reasons outlined in this article for the Huffington Post. But now ...

Wolf says that Obama is building on the Fascist foundations laid by the Bush administration. "What's frustrating in a way is that he does so gracefully and so charmingly, and charismatically saying all the right things, that I think many people have kind of stardust in their eyes."

See the entire interview here.

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

And Her Views On Family Law Reform ... ?

Sotomayor

This week, the latest corporate stooge to be nominated for the Supreme Court goes before Congress to face questions in what is supposed to be a confirmation hearing.

While the media is building this up as an event in which the unexpected just might happen, everyone knows that these hearings are entertainment. Her confirmation has already been rubber stamped by higher powers who, most likely, know she will be agreeable with big business and see tremendous potential in her ability to divide the masses along racial lines -- divide and conquer as they say.

But perhaps one of our elected leaders will ask her what her views on family law, and more specifically, family law reform, really are.

We won't hold our breath for this, because this is not one of the real issues our news manufacturers want discussed, and those doing the questioning are oblivious to the matter altogether.

If anyone out there is still watching this farce for entertainment, let us know if the most radical three-words in the English language -- FAMILY LAW REFORM -- are ever uttered by dropping us a line at mailcenter@ncpforce.com.

 

Monday, July 13, 2009

Gov't To Force Experimental Flu Vaccine?

The government will have you believe that it cares more about your children than you do. Which is why it now wants to force American children to take a mandatory, experimental flu vaccine this fall.

According to a report in the Washington Post, government officials have said that school children will be the first in line to receive the first 100 million doses of the vaccine. The Obama administration is also ramping up efforts to make sure that another 300 million doses of the vaccine will be rolled out through various state and local agencies in short order.

The talk has raised worries among certain health activists and civil rights activists who are concerned about children being forced to take the shot because of a similar large scale vaccination program in 1976 to deal with another swine flu scare. That program caused over 500 cases of a paralyzing nerve disease and killed 30 people -- more deaths than from that year's flu.

When the editor of political blog PissedOffFormerDemocrat recently called Arkansas State Health Department officials to discuss vaccination refusal, he was told that "mandatory vaccinations" could take place in the future and that they would be "legal" and could be carried out "constitutionally", and that those who refuse could be "held liable". A recording of this conversation can be heard at DailyMotion.

Of interest is that fact the company which will manufacture the vaccination, Baxter, was recently caught shipping flu vaccine contaminated with a lethal strain of avian flu. Luckily, the tainted shipment was caught by random testing in Czechoslovakia where a number of ferrets that were given the vaccine died from the virus.

Yes, our government certainly cares about our children. Loves them enough to give them an experimental vaccine from a company known to make horrific quality control mistakes, just to tackle a flu strain which many experts say may be no more dangerous than the ordinary flu. But hey, let's not forget there's a lot of money to be made for our legislators who invest in big pharmaceutical companies.

Sunday, July 12, 2009

Another Reason Why We Need Judicial Watch

Alex Kozinski

If there was ever any doubt whether or not the family law reform movement needed a judicial watchdog operation such NCPForce!'s Judicial Watch project, one need look no further than the case of Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

While Judge Kozinski was presiding over an obscenity case, it was learned that the good judge had an obscene publicly accessible website of his own featuring sexually explicit photos and videos, including: a photo of naked women on all fours painted to look like cows; a video of a half-dressed man cavorting with a sexually aroused farm animal; images of masturbation and public and contortionist sex; a slide show striptease featuring a transsexual; a series of photos of women's crotches as seen through snug fitting clothing or underwear; and content with themes of defecation and urination.

When the truth came out, Kozinski dismissed concerns over his website by saying that he thought some of the content was "funny." He also refused to disqualify himself from the case. Later on, however, Kozinski petitioned an ethics panel to investigate and blamed family members and friends for possibly posting some of the material. Kozinski finally recused himself from the obscenity case in June 2008.

Now, a year later, a panel of federal judges looking into Kozinski's behavior have swept the entire matter under the carpet by giving Kozinski a slap on the wrist. While calling Kozinski's actions "judicially imprudent" and "exhibiting poor judgment", the panel decided to allow Kozinski to continue judging other people.

Hmm ... poor judgment ... is that really a qualification for being a judge? This is what happens when we have judges disciplining judges, and lawyers disciplining lawyers.

Keep your reports on judges and your lawyer ratings coming!

Read the full story here:

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-kozinski3-2009jul03,0,2032797.story